Mirjam Sophia Glessmer

Evaluation rubric for Instagram posts (in scicomm and/or science classes!)

Social media is a great tool in science communication, so learning how to use it well is helpful not only for people who self-identify as science communicators, but also for scientists and scientists-to-be.

Teaching social media science communication skills

I’ve explained why I think that that is generally a good idea in our recent virtual poster, but here is an even more recent example of how well it can work: In early April, Prof. Tessa M Hill encouraged her class at UC Davis to do kitchen oceanography experiments and post pictures or videos on the internet. Her student Robert Dellinger posted a video of an overturning circulation on Twitter that got me super excited (and he kindly agreed to write this guest post on it) and as of now, April 16th, it has 70 retweets and 309 likes. That’s  an incredible reach! And if you think it’s just a lucky strike, another student from that class, Linnea Byrd, posted pictures on Instagram which got 276 likes. This might be to a beautiful cover pic and an account with a high following in the first place, but that’s still a lot of people exposed to kitchen oceanography. Both are definitely examples of very successful scicomm!

Talking with Prof. Kerstin Kremer in preparation for a recent science communication course I taught at her university, I decided that I wanted to set up an “evaluation rubric” that can be used for two purposes: As tool in teaching; and to evaluate social media posts.

Making expectations transparent to students

When teaching about the use of social media in science communication, there is a fine balance between, on the one side, a lot of information on what works and what doesn’t (aka “the rules”), and on the other hand the fact that the things that work best are when those exact rules are purpusefully and skillfully broken. But in order to do that, I believe that one needs to first know “the rules”, and the rubric below gives a structured overview that can be used as guidlines when creating an Instagram post.

Grading the students’ Instagram posts

For some classes, Instagram posts are created as artefacts that contribute to the course grade. In those cases, it is very important to be very clear about what the learning outcomes are and how they will be evaluated; especially if the posts are evaluated by someone who did not teach the class themselves. For this, the rubric below might be helpful.

Evaluation rubric for the scicomm aspect of Instagram posts

Please note:

  • This rubric is an example only and needs to be adapted and/or expanded to match your classes learning outcomes. Here, the focus is exclusively on the use of Instagram as a communication tool. For examples of how to expand this rubric for use in different contexts, see below
  • If points are awarded for each category listed below, they should obviously not be weighted equally when calculating a grade, but priorized according to the class’s learning outcomes
  • I’ve only formulated the end points; obviously this could be expanded to explicitly name intermediate qualitiy levels if that makes grading easier for you; I just wanted to put up a general framework.

The basic rubric is structured into four categories: The captions/comments of a post, the use of hashtags and tags, and the use of images.

Caption / CommentsNot good…………………..…………………very good
PurposePost does not fit in the usual context of the account and its target group; no context is given for why it is posted on that accountIt becomes clear why the post is published on a given account for its target group, either because it fits right in, or because contextual information is given
BackgroundThe post cannot be understood without pre-existing background knowledgeAll relevant background information is supplied
StructureNo structure obviousThe text is structured according to an obvious structure (hero’s journey, chronological, pro/con, facts/discussion, …)
CommentsCaption breaks off in the middle of the sentence and continues in a comment without any explanation linking the twoIf the text is too long for the main caption, there is a comment at the end of the main caption pointing out that the text continues in a comment below
JargonA lot of jargon in a text for kids, or too imprecise language for highly specialized/educated readersChoice of terminology appropriate for target group
Sentence lengthOnly 3-word sentences or one sentence for the whole paragraphGood readability because of appropriate sentence length
Spelling and grammarSeems like post has not been proofreadCorrect spelling and grammar
OutlookPost “just ends”The reader is given a “next step”: Link to further reading, key word to google, invitation to follow, call to action, …
EmojisWay too many or unrelated to the topicAppropriately used for the target audience and topic

 

Tags of other accountsNot good…………………..…………………very good
FitWay too many, and for no apparent reasonRelevant accounts are tagged (e.g. photographer of picture, institution that did the research, people that were involved in the project, people shown in the picture, …)

 

HashtagsNot good…………………..…………………very good
NumberNone, or way too many3-11
FitNo relation of hashtags to content of post, or bad fitHashtags describe the content of the post well and enable potentially interested audiences to find it
LanguageHashtag in random languagesLanguage matches the language of the post or complements it in a useful way (e.g. English post with English hashtags additionally uses German technical terms as hashtags to point to scicomm at a German institution)

 

PictureNot good…………………..…………………very good
Best practicePicture does not follow best practice recommendationsPicture follows best practice recommendations, e.g. no polar bears to raise awareness for climate change, careful with protest imagery, causes showed at scale, … (For climate communication practices, see climatevisuals.org)
FitPicture unrelated to content of postThe picture contributes information to the post
ReferencePicture is not referred to in postEach picture is referenced in the text and has a clear purpose to the narrative
QualityPicture clearly not tailored for Instagram and no explanation for why it was used anywayThe focus is on the relevant aspect or it is explained why the focus is elsewhere
RightsPicture not credited to rights holderThe author holds the rights and/or gives appropriate credit

Evaluation rubric for other aspects of Instagram posts

Of course, you might also want students to break some of “the rules” I gave above if your focus is on other aspects. For example, of you are very interested in how well students are working with literature, even though that is not something that is traditionally done well on Instagram, it is a very valid learning outcome that you might not want to give up, even if it breaks the traditional Instagram style. Then you could include criteria like these ones:

To practice citationsNot good…………………..…………………very good
Citation numberNo citationsAppropriate number of citations
Citation qualityCited literature not relevant for the topic discussed in the post, or list very incompleteAll relevant literature to the topic is cited
Citation correctnesIncorrect use of citation style or inappropriate citation styleAppropriate citation style, correctly used

Or if you are using Instagram posts in place of more traditional lab reports, of course additional learning outcomes are to be evaluated. Categories might then include, for example, the ones below. But use any criteria that you would use to evaluate a lab report!

As a lab reportNot good…………………..…………………very good
QuestionIt doesn’t become clear why experiments were doneIt is clearly stated what research question is being investigated
ContextIt doesn’t become clear if anyone else has ever done work related to the experiment presented hereThe experiment is placed in the context of existing research and theories
HypothesisNo hypothesis is statedA hypothesis is clearly stated and it is also justified on what basis it was formulated
PlanIt is not clear which steps are being done, in which order, and whyA clear plan of steps is presented together with a rationale for the steps and their order
MethodIt is not clear what methods are being used, and whyIt is clearly stated which methods are being used and for what reason they were chosen
ObservationsThere are noneObservations are clearly described
InterpretationIt is not clear how conclusions are formed from the observations, or there are no conclusionsThere is a clear separation between observations and the conclusions that are being drawn on the basis of those observations

Now let me know what you think. Was this blogpost useful for you? What other aspect of using social media in science teaching would you be interested in?

Leave a Reply

  1. […] Storytelling is used for many different purpose — pure entertainment as well as science communication, advertising, health communication, PR, and many more. In higher education, they can be a teaching-learning format (for example watching the movie “day after tomorrow” or reading Dürrenmatt’s “Die Physiker”), a method for gaining knowledge (so asking someone to tell a story to us, or using existing stories, as an intervention or in order to try to understand how someone thinks), and as science communication (for example how we have used it for assessment). […]

  2. […] profile, but also because there are surpisingly many people who get really excited about (read here how Prof. Tessa M Hill‘s student Robert Dellinger posted a video of an overturning […]

Share this post via

Contact me!

Adventures in Oceanography and Teaching © 2013-2026 by Mirjam Sophia Glessmer is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Search "Adventures in Teaching and Oceanography"

Archives