<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>learning outcomes &#8211; Adventures in Oceanography and Teaching</title>
	<atom:link href="https://mirjamglessmer.com/tag/learning-outcomes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://mirjamglessmer.com</link>
	<description>Dr. Mirjam S. Glessmer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 05:19:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Operationalising and assessing sustainability competencies (some ideas from Wiek et al. (2016) and Redman et al. (2020))</title>
		<link>https://mirjamglessmer.com/2024/03/08/operationalising-and-assessing-sustainability-competencies-some-ideas-from-wiek-et-al-2016-and-redman-et-al-2020/</link>
					<comments>https://mirjamglessmer.com/2024/03/08/operationalising-and-assessing-sustainability-competencies-some-ideas-from-wiek-et-al-2016-and-redman-et-al-2020/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mglessmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 08:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authentic assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[key competencies for sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[learning outcomes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teaching for sustainability]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://mirjamglessmer.com/?p=21031</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We put a lot of effort into teaching for sustainability, but whether or not we are actually successful in doing so remains unclear until we figure out a way to operationalise learning outcomes and, obviously, ways to assess them. Below, I am summarising two articles to get a quick idea of how one might do [&#8230;]
<p><a href="https://mirjamglessmer.com/2024/03/08/operationalising-and-assessing-sustainability-competencies-some-ideas-from-wiek-et-al-2016-and-redman-et-al-2020/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://mirjamglessmer.com/2024/03/08/operationalising-and-assessing-sustainability-competencies-some-ideas-from-wiek-et-al-2016-and-redman-et-al-2020/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">21031</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Negotiating a rubric of learning outcomes and letting students pick the format in which they show they&#8217;ve mastered the learning outcomes</title>
		<link>https://mirjamglessmer.com/2021/07/04/negotiating-a-rubric-of-learning-outcomes-and-letting-students-pick-the-format-in-which-they-show-theyve-mastered-the-learning-outcomes/</link>
					<comments>https://mirjamglessmer.com/2021/07/04/negotiating-a-rubric-of-learning-outcomes-and-letting-students-pick-the-format-in-which-they-show-theyve-mastered-the-learning-outcomes/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mglessmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 18:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[active learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co-creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[learning outcomes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rubric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[students as partners]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://mirjamglessmer.com/?p=16699</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m still inspired by Cathy&#8217;s work on &#8220;co-creation&#8221;, and an episode of &#8220;Lecture Breakers&#8221; (I think the first one on student engagement techniques where they talked about letting students choose the format of the artefact they do for assessment purposes; but I binge-listened, and honestly, they are all inspiring!). And something that Sam recently said [&#8230;]
<p><a href="https://mirjamglessmer.com/2021/07/04/negotiating-a-rubric-of-learning-outcomes-and-letting-students-pick-the-format-in-which-they-show-theyve-mastered-the-learning-outcomes/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://mirjamglessmer.com/2021/07/04/negotiating-a-rubric-of-learning-outcomes-and-letting-students-pick-the-format-in-which-they-show-theyve-mastered-the-learning-outcomes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">16699</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The structural complexity of learning outcomes</title>
		<link>https://mirjamglessmer.com/2014/08/22/the-structural-complexity-of-learning-outcomes/</link>
					<comments>https://mirjamglessmer.com/2014/08/22/the-structural-complexity-of-learning-outcomes/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mglessmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 04:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloom's taxonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[learning outcomes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mirjamsophiaglessmer.wordpress.com/?p=1560</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome taxonomy. I talked about the classification of learning outcomes according to Blooms&#8217;s taxonomy recently, and got a lot of feedback from readers that the examples of multiple-choice questions at different Bloom-levels were helpful. So today I want to present a different taxonomy, &#8220;Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome&#8221;, SOLO, this one [&#8230;]
<p><a href="https://mirjamglessmer.com/2014/08/22/the-structural-complexity-of-learning-outcomes/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://mirjamglessmer.com/2014/08/22/the-structural-complexity-of-learning-outcomes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1560</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Classifying educational goals using Bloom&#8217;s taxonomy</title>
		<link>https://mirjamglessmer.com/2014/07/30/classifying-educational-goals-using-blooms-taxonomy/</link>
					<comments>https://mirjamglessmer.com/2014/07/30/classifying-educational-goals-using-blooms-taxonomy/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mglessmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 04:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloom's taxonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[learning outcomes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mirjamsophiaglessmer.wordpress.com/?p=1431</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How can you classify different levels of skills you want your students to gain from your classes? Learning objectives are traditionally categorized after Bloom&#8217;s (1956) taxonomy. Bloom separates learning objectives in three classes: cognitive, affective and psychomotor. Cognitive learning objectives are about what people know, understand and about their thinking processes dealing with and synthesizing that knowledge. [&#8230;]
<p><a href="https://mirjamglessmer.com/2014/07/30/classifying-educational-goals-using-blooms-taxonomy/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://mirjamglessmer.com/2014/07/30/classifying-educational-goals-using-blooms-taxonomy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1431</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
