<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Currently reading Loughlin et al. (2025) on &#8220;Reclaiming constructive alignment&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://mirjamglessmer.com/2025/09/04/currently-reading-loughlin-et-al-2025-on-reclaiming-constructive-alignment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://mirjamglessmer.com/2025/09/04/currently-reading-loughlin-et-al-2025-on-reclaiming-constructive-alignment/</link>
	<description>Dr. Mirjam S. Glessmer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2025 18:50:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Reading more about constructive alignment (Wickström, 2015, on &#34;Dekonstruerad länkning: En kritisk läsning av Constructive Alignment inom svensk högskolepedagogik och pedagogisk utveckling&#34;) - Adventures in Oceanography and Teaching		</title>
		<link>https://mirjamglessmer.com/2025/09/04/currently-reading-loughlin-et-al-2025-on-reclaiming-constructive-alignment/#comment-4190</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reading more about constructive alignment (Wickström, 2015, on &#34;Dekonstruerad länkning: En kritisk läsning av Constructive Alignment inom svensk högskolepedagogik och pedagogisk utveckling&#34;) - Adventures in Oceanography and Teaching]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2025 18:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://mirjamglessmer.com/?p=26031#comment-4190</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] academic development has become dominated by very few concepts and theoretical models, mostly constructive alignment, Bloom&#8216;s and SOLO taxonomy, and deep- and surface learning (which, funnily enough, I [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] academic development has become dominated by very few concepts and theoretical models, mostly constructive alignment, Bloom&#8216;s and SOLO taxonomy, and deep- and surface learning (which, funnily enough, I [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
